<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom and the Proper Regulation of Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/</link>
	<description>Reality, Reason, Self, Consent, Capitalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tjitze</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Tjitze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Great explanation Paul!

But isn&#039;t fraud also theft because after the &#039;&#039;trade&#039;&#039; the objects witch rightfully belong to you because of that trade are held back by force.

If someone sells you something witch they claim to be a soda pop but is not are they not withholding an actual soda pop from you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation Paul!</p>
<p>But isn&#8217;t fraud also theft because after the &#8221;trade&#8221; the objects witch rightfully belong to you because of that trade are held back by force.</p>
<p>If someone sells you something witch they claim to be a soda pop but is not are they not withholding an actual soda pop from you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. M.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>K. M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-328</guid>
		<description>I have a rebuttal of your argument &lt;a href=&quot;http://fortruth.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/freedom-of-speech/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I would have posted it as a comment but it became a little too long.

The crux of my rebuttal is your equivocation on freedom and control. They are not the same. From my post:
&quot;Man is free by nature. He does not control his own life in the same sense. For example, I do not control whether I get to keep my job. If my employer decides to fire me, is he causing me to lose my control? I do not control my immediate emotions. If a stranger abuses me verbally and I get angry, is he causing me to lose my control? In both these cases I retain my freedom but do I lose my control or did I never have it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a rebuttal of your argument <a href="http://fortruth.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/freedom-of-speech/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I would have posted it as a comment but it became a little too long.</p>
<p>The crux of my rebuttal is your equivocation on freedom and control. They are not the same. From my post:<br />
&#8220;Man is free by nature. He does not control his own life in the same sense. For example, I do not control whether I get to keep my job. If my employer decides to fire me, is he causing me to lose my control? I do not control my immediate emotions. If a stranger abuses me verbally and I get angry, is he causing me to lose my control? In both these cases I retain my freedom but do I lose my control or did I never have it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom of Speech &#171; Applying philosophy to life</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom of Speech &#171; Applying philosophy to life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] of&#160;Speech  Posted on October 3, 2008 by K. M.   Paul McKeever has a post on Freedom and the Proper Regulation of Speech in which he claims that it is the role of government to outlaw speech that denies individuals [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of&nbsp;Speech  Posted on October 3, 2008 by K. M.   Paul McKeever has a post on Freedom and the Proper Regulation of Speech in which he claims that it is the role of government to outlaw speech that denies individuals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKeever</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McKeever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Thank-you for the compliment Luke.

No, they didn&#039;t teach me how to write like that in law school.  I&#039;m not sure that anyone rightly deserves the blame for the way that I write, except myself.  ;-)

Cheers,

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank-you for the compliment Luke.</p>
<p>No, they didn&#8217;t teach me how to write like that in law school.  I&#8217;m not sure that anyone rightly deserves the blame for the way that I write, except myself.  ;-)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Well said Paul. Do they teach you to write like that at law school?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Paul. Do they teach you to write like that at law school?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKeever</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McKeever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Compliments appreciated, thanks.  Fuel for the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compliments appreciated, thanks.  Fuel for the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kauppinen</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kauppinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Good article.  It was needed in response to a youtube post by someone who&#039;s screen name evades me at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  It was needed in response to a youtube post by someone who&#8217;s screen name evades me at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-322</guid>
		<description>That was excellent.  I especially like this part:

&quot;Control necessarily implies consent. Agreement procured with false or arbitrary claims is essentially equivalent to agreement procured at the point of a gun: agreement, in such cases, is not consent. In respect of attempts to deprive someone of control over his life, liberty or property, the effect of false or arbitrary claims is the same as the effect of coercive physical force: to obviate consent.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was excellent.  I especially like this part:</p>
<p>&#8220;Control necessarily implies consent. Agreement procured with false or arbitrary claims is essentially equivalent to agreement procured at the point of a gun: agreement, in such cases, is not consent. In respect of attempts to deprive someone of control over his life, liberty or property, the effect of false or arbitrary claims is the same as the effect of coercive physical force: to obviate consent.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amlan Gupta</title>
		<link>http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/2008/09/24/freedom-and-the-proper-regulation-of-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Amlan Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paulmckeever.ca/?p=386#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

This comment is not related to this article but I was not sure how to submit a general question to you.  My question concerns voting in the federal election - in my riding, there does not seem to be a single party that I can in good conscience vote for.

I seem to recall reading somewhere (maybe even your blog) that there is a way to register a protest vote or blank vote that will not be counted as a spoiled ballot.  I don&#039;t expect to find such information on the Elections Canada web site, but can you provide any guidance?

Thanks for the help.

Amlan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>This comment is not related to this article but I was not sure how to submit a general question to you.  My question concerns voting in the federal election &#8211; in my riding, there does not seem to be a single party that I can in good conscience vote for.</p>
<p>I seem to recall reading somewhere (maybe even your blog) that there is a way to register a protest vote or blank vote that will not be counted as a spoiled ballot.  I don&#8217;t expect to find such information on the Elections Canada web site, but can you provide any guidance?</p>
<p>Thanks for the help.</p>
<p>Amlan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
